MicroStrategy founder Michael Saylor recently provided a critical assessment of the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 (BIP-110), noting that the upgrade has failed to gain significant traction among the broader mining community. According to data shared by Saylor on the social media platform X, the proposal's support rate sat at a mere 2.54% at block height 960,561, indicating a lack of the necessary consensus required for implementation on the Bitcoin network.
Low Signal Rate and Centralized Support
The technical data reveals that out of 946 blocks analyzed, only 24 signals were recorded in favor of the proposal. Saylor highlighted a specific concentration in these figures, pointing out that all supportive signals originated exclusively from DATUM miners who share rewards through the OCEAN mining pool. Outside of this specific group, the support rate remains at zero, making it impossible to reach the 55% voluntary threshold typically required to demonstrate widespread miner agreement.
- Total support rate: 2.54%
- Total signaling blocks: 24 out of 946
- Primary source of support: OCEAN mining pool
- Current consensus status: Not reached
Marketing Concerns and Vertical Integration
Beyond the statistics, Saylor expressed concerns regarding the transparency and intent behind the signaling process. He suggested that OCEAN has configured BIP-110 signals as a default setting, potentially inflating the appearance of organic support. Furthermore, he noted that the BIP-110 documentation directs node operators toward Bitcoin Knots and miners toward DATUM.
This effectively acts as a vertical integration marketing campaign for Knots and OCEAN.
Bitcoin Knots is an alternative Bitcoin Core client that includes specific policy features not found in the standard software. Saylor added that any "100 signal" metrics displayed during the block window from 961,632 to 963,647 would simply reflect these pre-set rules rather than a shift in global miner sentiment.
In conclusion, the current trajectory of BIP-110 suggests a significant divide between a small group of specialized contributors and the majority of the Bitcoin hashing power. Without broader adoption beyond the OCEAN and DATUM ecosystem, the proposal is unlikely to achieve the network-wide consensus necessary for a formal upgrade, reinforcing the decentralized and conservative nature of the Bitcoin protocol's governance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Quick answers to the most common questions about this topic.
For educational purposes only. Nothing here constitutes financial or investment advice. Crypto markets are highly volatile — always DYOR before making any decisions.
Fact-checked per our editorial policy. We maintain strict independence from advertisers. Spot an error? Let us know.